Siddaramaiah Flags Tax Devolution Anomaly; FM Promises Review

Why Karnataka’s Tax Devolution Share Is in the Spotlight

Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has reignited the debate on tax devolution anomaly, claiming the state is being unfairly treated in the Finance Commission’s fund-sharing formula. In response, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman has agreed to look into the issue — a rare acknowledgment that could impact how central funds are distributed to states in the future.

Let’s decode what this anomaly is all about, how it affects Karnataka and others, and what it means for taxpayers and state finances.


What Is Tax Devolution?

Tax devolution refers to the share of central taxes (like Income Tax and GST) that the Union Government transfers to states based on Finance Commission recommendations. As per Article 280 of the Constitution, the Finance Commission decides how much each state should get, considering factors like:

  • Population (1971 & 2011)
  • Area
  • Forest cover
  • Tax effort
  • Income distance

For FY 2024–25, around ₹12.20 lakh crore has been allocated for devolution to states as per Union Budget documents.


What Is the Tax Devolution Anomaly?

The tax devolution anomaly flagged by Karnataka arises because:

  • The state contributes heavily to central taxes (like GST, Income Tax).
  • But the Finance Commission formula does not reward actual tax contribution.
  • Instead, it gives more weight to population and income distance (states with lower per capita income get more).

📌 Result: Karnataka contributes over ₹4.3 lakh crore to central taxes but gets a disproportionately lower share in return.


Siddaramaiah’s Demands and FM’s Response

  • Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah wrote to FM Sitharaman in June 2025.
  • He highlighted that Karnataka’s share in central tax devolution has fallen from 4.71% in 15th FC’s interim period to 3.64% now.
  • This drop translates to a loss of over ₹60,000 crore for the state over 5 years.

🗨️ FM Nirmala Sitharaman’s response:
While speaking at a public event, she acknowledged the concern and stated that “genuine anomalies” would be looked into during the next Finance Commission cycle.


Legal & Constitutional Backing

  • Article 280: Mandates setting up of Finance Commission every 5 years.
  • 15th Finance Commission Report: Used 2011 population and income distance with 45% weight combined.
  • No provision currently mandates sharing based on actual tax contribution by states.

Expert view:

“There’s a mismatch between fiscal federalism and equity. Tax devolution should ideally reflect both contribution and need,” says Prof. R. Narayanaswamy, IIM-B.


Why This Matters for Indian Taxpayers and Businesses

  • States like Karnataka and Maharashtra generate significant tax revenue.
  • But reduced devolution limits their spending capacity on infrastructure, education, and health.
  • Businesses operating in these states may see higher state taxes or reduced incentives as compensation.

Possible Solutions Going Forward

Reform IdeaImpact
Weightage for tax contributionRewards high-performance states
Balanced criteria (need + effort)Combines equity with efficiency
Incentivise digital complianceEncourages better GST and direct tax reporting

Pro Tip for Tax Professionals

If you operate in states with a high revenue base but low devolution share, track state budget changes closely. These states may hike local levies or reduce subsidies to offset fund shortfalls.


Summary

Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah flagged a tax devolution anomaly, claiming the state’s central fund share is unfairly low despite high tax contributions. FM Nirmala Sitharaman acknowledged the issue and promised a review. This opens doors for potential Finance Commission reforms in India’s federal fund-sharing model.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1. What is tax devolution?
Tax devolution is the transfer of a portion of central tax revenues to state governments, based on Finance Commission recommendations.

Q2. Why is Karnataka raising the anomaly issue?
Despite contributing significantly to central taxes, Karnataka’s share in devolution has declined, impacting state finances.

Q3. Can the Finance Commission change the formula?
Yes. Every Commission re-evaluates the formula based on constitutional mandate and changing economic realities.


🔗 Related Content from Efiletax


Need Help with Tax Planning or State Filings?

Efiletax helps businesses and individuals handle complex tax compliance, GST returns, and advisory — all under one platform.

Table