Sub-Contractors Liable for Service Tax: Key Takeaways from CESTAT Ruling
In a significant ruling, the CESTAT Delhi has clarified that sub-contractors liable for service tax cannot escape liability merely because the main contractor has already discharged tax on the full contract value. This decision directly affects contractors, sub-contractors, and GST consultants handling legacy service tax matters under transitional provisions.
What Was the CESTAT Case About?
In the case of M/s GVK Projects and Technical Services Ltd vs CCE Hyderabad-II [Service Tax Appeal No. 30053/2018], the appellant (a sub-contractor) argued that service tax demand should not be raised on them since the main contractor had already paid service tax on the total amount billed to the service recipient.
But the CESTAT rejected this argument, holding that:
- The sub-contractor is an independent taxable person.
- The main contractor and sub-contractor have separate legal obligations.
- Service tax is not a cascading tax, and double taxation isn’t legally an issue in this context if both provide independent services.
Why Are Sub-Contractors Still Liable?
Under the Finance Act, 1994 (legacy service tax regime):
- Each service provider is treated as a distinct assessee.
- Liability to pay service tax arises when taxable service is provided, regardless of whether another party also pays tax on related services.
So even if the main contractor charges the full invoice and pays service tax, the sub-contractor must still pay tax on the service rendered to the main contractor—unless exempted or covered by reverse charge (for certain specified categories).
Service Tax vs GST: What’s the Difference?
| Point | Service Tax (Old Regime) | GST (Current Regime) |
|---|---|---|
| Taxable Person | Service provider (including sub-contractor) | Supplier of goods/services |
| Cascading | Partial – input credits allowed but restricted | Eliminated via full ITC |
| Double Taxation Issue | Possible if both contractor and sub-contractor taxed separately | Reduced due to input tax credit chain |
| Reverse Charge | Applied to select services only | Broader RCM scope, especially in B2G contracts |
Expert View:
“Many businesses assume that once tax is paid by the main contractor, their compliance is done. That’s a risky myth under both service tax and GST. Sub-contractors should verify their independent tax obligations instead of relying solely on upstream vendors.” — GST Consultant Panel, Efiletax
What Should Sub-Contractors Do Now?
If you’re a sub-contractor with pending legacy service tax demands, here’s what you should do:
- Check past transactions (especially from FY 2014–15 to 2016–17).
- If service tax wasn’t paid due to this misunderstanding, evaluate if you’re covered under any amnesty scheme or limitation period.
- In GST era, ensure you’re not repeating the same assumption—input tax credit doesn’t mean exemption from tax liability.
Legal Reference & Link
- CESTAT Judgment: Click to access full text on taxmann.com
- Service Tax under Finance Act, 1994
- Transitional Provisions under Section 140 of CGST Act
Related Blogs from Efiletax
- Can GST Amnesty Scheme Help Settle Old Service Tax Dues?
- Service Tax to GST: Key Transitional Challenges Explained
FAQs
Q1. Can a sub-contractor avoid tax liability if the main contractor already paid tax?
No. As per CESTAT, both are independent service providers. Sub-contractor is liable.
Q2. Is double taxation allowed under service tax?
Yes, because tax is on service provided, not on the contract value duplication.
Q3. How to handle this in GST?
Under GST, ITC can be claimed, but each party must pay their own output tax.
Summary
Sub-contractors must pay service tax even if the main contractor has already paid, ruled CESTAT. Each is treated as a distinct taxable entity under the Finance Act, 1994.
Final Note:
Still dealing with old service tax notices or unsure about GST liability on subcontracting? Efiletax can help you assess and respond legally and efficiently.
Get expert help now →